Showing posts with label Office. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Office. Show all posts

Wednesday, 7 August 2013

Office 365 now available on Android

Following the release of Office Mobile for iPhone, Microsoft has launched Office Mobile for Android.

The cloud-based version of Office, which is available to users in the US, will be free to people who already subscribe to Office 365. This means that Office 365 subscribers can now work on their Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents from virtually anywhere, using their Windows Phone, iPhone or Android handsets.



45525_Office-365.jpg
Available from the Google Play Store, the app is available to users with a qualifying Office 365 subscription, including Office 365 Home Premium or Office 365 ProPlus. Microsoft said more countries will gain access in coming weeks.

The app enables users to view and edit Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents in the cloud on SkyDrive or SkyDrive Pro. Microsoft said it synchronises with a PC, so that documents edited on a computer are available in the Recent Documents panel. Users can also view and edit documents received as email attachments.

“The release of this app shows that we're committed to keep providing additional value for Office 365 subscribers," said Guy Gilbert, senior product manager at Microsoft. "Office 365 subscribers will now be able to access, view and edit Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents with Windows Phone, iPhone and Android phones.”

Saturday, 27 July 2013

Corner Office: Paul English of Kayak, on Nurturing New Ideas

Q. Did you have the entrepreneurial itch early on?

A. I always wanted to just try new things, and I think it was probably in my DNA or something. As a kid, I would see something I didn’t like, and I wanted to make it better. So, for example, we had a phone in my house that was a one-line dial phone, and I had to get a second phone line for my computer. So I rewired the phone to handle two lines. I was really proud of that phone.

Q. And what about your high school years?

A. I had lots of side interests, but I wasn’t very interested in studying in high school. My grades were pretty much all D’s, and I didn’t apply to college. The only reason I went to college was that my parents found out I could go to state school for free because of my SAT scores. I had a day job and I went to school at night. But I had a different job every 12 to 18 months because I’d get bored and I’d want to learn something new.

Q. Once you launched your career, what were some leadership lessons you learned?

A. The most important thing I learned is something I’m still actually working on, which is how to be really blunt with feedback. It’s the most difficult thing for a manager to do. But I worked hard at it, because when managers were blunt with me, it hurt a little bit, but I’m very grateful to those few managers who helped me.

I developed this technique over the years. When I gave people their performance reviews, I would literally take a crinkled envelope, and I’d write five words on it. I would take them out to lunch, and I’d say to them, “Let’s say I left this company, and five years from now I was sitting in a bar and someone said, ‘Hey, what’s that guy like?’ What I would tell them is what I’m going to tell you. And there are two or three words that are positive, and there are two or three words that are really negative.” I would give examples and I would give them the piece of paper, so I had no written record of what we had talked about. One guy in particular e-mailed me 10 years later, and claimed that he still carries that piece of paper around. That really reinforced for me the idea that the best way you can help someone is to be on their side and to be honest with them.

Q. You were a co-founder of Kayak nine years ago. What’s unusual about the culture?

A. We’re a little bit reckless in our decision-making — not with the business, but the point is that we try things. We give even junior people scary amounts of power to come up with ideas and implement them. We had an intern last summer who, on his very first day at Kayak, came up with an idea, wrote the code and released it. It may or may not have been successful, but it almost doesn’t matter, because it showed that we value speed, and we value testing ideas, not talking about them.

It’s all about fast iteration. When you push down decisions, and you don’t require people to write up plans and do designs by consensus, enormous amounts of work just disappear. We cut out all the middle layers and you let the designers talk to the customers. Otherwise, something gets lost in translation with a lot of layers.

Q. What else?

A. We’re known for having very small meetings, usually three people. There’s a little clicker for counting people that hangs on the main conference room door. The reason it’s there is to send a message to people that I care about this issue. If there’s a bunch of people in the room, I’ll stick my head in and say, “It takes 10 of you to decide this? There aren’t three of you smart enough to do this?”

I just hate design by consensus. No innovation happens with 10 people in a room. It’s very easy to be a critic and say why something won’t work. I don’t want that because new ideas are like these little precious things that can die very easily. Two or three people will nurture it, and make it stronger, give it a chance to see life.

Q. How do you hire?

A. You always have to be recruiting. When I meet somebody who’s amazing, I’ll often say to them, “Who’s the smartest person you’ve ever met?” My team might be sick of me asking the question, because I’ll keep asking. Finally, after the third or fourth time, they’ll say, “You know, there was this person.”

Then the two criteria I really look for are productivity — which is about speed and judgment and drive — and the second one is fun. A lot of companies have the no-jerks rule. But I have the “no neutrals” rule.

Q. Can you explain that?

A. We want to be a hyperproductive company and we want to make it fun, and I make a commitment to people that in 20 years they’ll look back and say this was the most fun job they had. If you surround them with people who are annoying or just kind of neutral, it’s going to make the job a drag. And you don’t ever want to hurt someone’s creative energy.

Certainly, annoying people will hurt them, and so will people who are just kind of boring. They’re nice, but they don’t ever provoke the creative person in a fun way. That diminishes their productivity. If I have a commitment to improving people’s productivity and fun, then I have to surround them with people who are fun and who will challenge them.

Q. So how do you get at that in an interview?

A. I know how to assess people about their speed and their product sense and their technical skills. The area that’s much harder to assess is culture. So I’ll look at the résumé, and find something that’s interesting. Then I’ll have them describe to me the team they worked with, and I’ll ask them about each person on the team — “Tell me something they did that blew you away and tell me something they did that annoyed you.” I make them talk about real people and the real product. From that, I can figure out their values and how they see other people. That gives me a really good sense about whether they will fit on my team. 

Thursday, 25 July 2013

The Mac office: Picturing a better way to communicate

An AT&T commercial from 1993 asked, among other things, “Have you ever tucked your baby in from a phone booth?” We see a mother making a video call to her child in a public phone booth, and the voice-over assures us, “You will.”

Twenty years ago, the vision for video calling in the future was that it would be universal—and as simple and interoperable as telephones. Now we all have cameras built into our Macs, iPhones, and iPads, and maybe even our TVs. And it is indeed possible to buy a device called a videophone. Video communication is commonplace, but the problem is that there are dozens of competing systems, services, and protocols. Whichever one of these you choose on a given occasion may or may not work for the party on the other end. And if two people have several options to choose from, figuring out which works best can be an exercise in frustration.

Because I work at home and my colleagues and clients are scattered around the world, I regularly rely on video for meetings, presentations, demos, and other business get-togethers. So I have software installed, and accounts set up, for Facebook Video Calling, FaceTime, Google+ Hangouts, Messages, Skype, and a few others services—each on several different devices. And yet, I rarely have a truly satisfactory voice- or video-chat experience. Nearly every time someone wants to conduct a video call with me, we have to go through multiple rounds of negotiation and fiddling, and even then something often goes wrong.



In Messages, you can use more than one protocol with the same account—for example, you might use a mac.com address with both iMessages and AIM. The choice matters because different protocols have different features.
If I want to have a plain, one-on-one video call with someone, nearly any service will work. But, if one party or the other wants to share a computer’s screen, our choices narrow. (FaceTime and Facebook are out, for example.) If I want the other party to see my face and all or part of my screen at the same time—as I do, for example, when delivering a remote video presentation to a user group—I have even fewer options. And if we want more than two parties to be involved in the conversation, yet another set of constraints kicks in.

Then there are technical issues. Although Skype was once my go-to service, almost every Skype call I’ve had in the last two years with more than two participants (whether audio-only or video) has degraded to the point of uselessness within a half hour or so, forcing us to stop the call and reconnect—even though all parties have great bandwidth, fast computers, and up-to-date software.

Time and again, I’ve had problems with people using Messages because they had it configured to use the right account but with the wrong protocol. And even when the account is set up correctly, I frequently find that Messages users on public Wi-Fi networks can’t connect, because some of the ports Messages needs are commonly blocked. My Macworld editors can attest to the problem of horrible echoing in Google+ Hangouts if microphones are placed incorrectly in a meeting room.

Now, I can guess what you’re thinking, even before you write it in the comments, which I know you will: “Your whole problem is that you haven’t mentioned my favorite video service, X, which is brilliant and perfect and the best thing ever! How could you have omitted the obvious solution?”

Well, I’ll tell you.

The reason I mentioned the services I did is that any Mac or iOS user can access them for free, and most of us already have the software and accounts we need. Anything else requires something extra—usually downloading an app or plug-in, struggling with a Flash-based interface, setting up an account, paying a monthly fee, or some combination of the above. All those things are barriers for every other participant.

The reason I mentioned the services I did is that any Mac or iOS user can access them for free, and most of us already have the software and accounts we need. Anything else requires something extra.
True story: A developer wanted to demo some new software for me, so we set up an online meeting. I thought we were going to use Skype or Google+ Hangouts, but at the last minute, I received a message saying we’d be using GoToMeeting, a commercial videoconferencing service. To participate in the call, I had to download, install, and configure GoToMeeting’s software on my Mac, an annoying extra step. A few days later, the same developer wanted to follow up on some additional features, and I assumed we’d use GoToMeeting again. But this time they wanted to use join.me, which would have forced me to download and install yet another plug-in. I said no: Life is too short, and I don’t need to junk up my Mac with a bunch of software I’ll use only once and forget about.

Yes, I’m familiar with other consumer services such as ooVoo and other business-oriented services such as MegaMeeting.com and WebEx Meetings. There are tons of ways to have a video conversation online, but that’s the problem. They’re all proprietary, and they all require extra effort or expense from at least one of the participants. I can never just say, “I’ll call you,” as I can with telephone calls.



A Google+ Hangout can include up to ten participants, and if you choose to make it public, you can also have it automatically recorded and posted on YouTube.
I still want the future that AT&T promised in 1993. I want to be able to give someone my video ID and know for certain that we’ll be able to see and hear each other regardless of who manufactured our devices or what service we’ve subscribed to. I’d like it even better if I could make the same assumptions about videoconference calls that I can make with audio calls, and if screen sharing were universal.

But it doesn’t look like that future will be coming any time soon. In the meantime, here’s how I choose which service to use:

One-on-one video calls: I use FaceTime for family and close friends who I know have iOS devices, and Skype for everyone else (or when screen sharing is necessary).

Meetings with three or more participants: Google+ Hangouts is the best option here, because almost everyone already has a Google account, and pretty much everyone I work with already has Google’s voice- and video-chat plug-in installed. (Unlike Messages, Hangouts supports up to ten participants; and unlike Skype, Hangouts lets you conduct a multiperson video chat for free.)

For presentations in which I want the other party to see live video of my face alongside a Keynote presentation, I usually use Messages with an AIM account so that I can take advantage of Theater mode. For presentations involving video of two or more people at the same time plus a shared screen, I use Hangouts, logging in from two computers at the same time—one for my face and the other for screen sharing.



If you want the other party to see live video of your face as well as a Keynote presentation, Messages (using the AIM protocol) is an excellent choice. Before you schedule a video meeting, reflect on two questions. Ask yourself not only whether the service you intend to use has all the features you need, but also how convenient your choice will be for the other party or parties. If you can avoid making someone else jump through extra hoops to accommodate you, you'll get your meeting off to a much better start. 

Friday, 19 July 2013

Corner Office: Andre Durand of Ping Identity, on Setting Reachable Goals

Q. Were you an entrepreneur early on?


A. As far back as I can remember. My mother says that when I was about 4 years old, I was selling my toys. Later on, I had a paper route, but I didn’t stop there. I started selling synthetic motor oil to the people on my paper route. I figured that if I was already collecting the money for the papers, I could sell them oil, too. I also rebuilt and sold bikes that I pulled out of the Dumpster. Then, when I was about 19, I got my first PC. I just fell in love with software.


Q. You’ve started a few companies. What were some early leadership lessons you learned, particularly about culture?


A. My aspirations were always bigger early on than our resources. The way that manifested itself was that I never raised enough money early on to make money less of a factor in the way we made decisions. That meant I was either always pressured to ship software that wasn’t quite ready, which is a little bit of a death spiral, or I was always raising money within a few days of payroll — and asking the employees to trust me and to not quit.


So I was trying to be bigger than I could afford to be, and your decision-making is always convoluted by these factors. That was a big early lesson. It ingrained in me the importance of matching the entrepreneurial aspirations with the resources. Those all have to be aligned. And ever since, I’ve always raised money when I don’t need it ahead of time, for a rainy day. I just never put myself in that position again.


Q. Other big lessons?


A. I would say the overarching lesson is that there are no shortcuts, no Hail Marys, no silver bullets. It’s easy, early on, to think that you can somehow just jump right to the endgame. I can tell you that kind of thinking is pretty dangerous and unhealthy. In my experience, when you reach the goal you’re after, more often than not it’s fairly well deserved by the time you get there.


Here’s another lesson I learned. When you’re younger, you create a lot of expectations about who you’re going to be, where you’re going to be when you’re 40. It’s as if life past 40 doesn’t exist. So when you think of your relationship to time in that construct, you’re very impatient. My mind-set at 20 was that I had self-imposed deadlines that ended at 40.


But here’s the paradox. When you get to 40, a couple of things happen. You look at the second half of your life, and you realize that life is not endless, and that it is very finite. Yet somehow you can learn patience. I became very cognizant of the relationship between patience and time and decision-making. When I became patient, I simply made better decisions.


Q. So much of leadership is about finding the right balance point. Other thoughts on that?


A. One of the things I’ve really come to appreciate is that you tend to work harder when you’re winning. So you have to make sure that when you’re setting goals for people and the organization, they aren’t so far out that they’re unachievable, which will leave people demoralized.


You have to be careful and thoughtful about the way you set expectations. You don’t want them to be slam-dunks, but you don’t want them to be unattainable, either. They need to be within the realm of attainable. Even though you don’t have every step of the way figured out, you’re pretty confident that you’re matching the resources and the talent and the goals, and that all of those are aligned.


You can either create a circumstance where you build this positive vortex where everything right out of the gate is leading you toward more and more success, where you’re more motivated to not miss, or you can become trapped in what I call a cyclone of doom. And they start with these very small, seemingly innocuous decisions almost out of the gate and then they build on one another. So you’re either heading down or you’re heading up.

Q. How do you hire? What qualities are you looking for?


A. There is a subtle but important difference between people who want to work at a company to do something great and people who want to go to a company because they want to join something great. One group wants to pull and one group wants to ride.


Q. What questions do you ask to determine that?


A. I listen carefully to the language they use as we’re talking. I haven’t distilled it to a question yet that embodies the difference between these two, but oftentimes it just shows up in conversation in little ways. Somebody might say: “I’ve always liked what you guys were about. I’ve taken a look at what you’re offering and I can see how I can help.” They’ve identified a need and they’ve assessed their own skill set and they see how they can bring value.


Q. And what’s the off-key version of that?


A. I’ve had conversations where people will say: “I’ve visited your ‘About’ page and your ‘Culture’ page and your ‘Career’ page and it looks like a lot of fun. You guys look like you have a great culture.”


Q. What advice would you give aspiring entrepreneurs?


A. Everyone talks about the role of persistence, and I’ve come to like this one-liner: “The world filters out the uncommitted.” It’s not just entrepreneurship — it’s true about anything you want to do.


I also see a lot of brilliant people overthinking. They overanalyze an idea before it’s even off the ground. They have a smart idea, but they spend all their time thinking about all the what-ifs. By the time they’ve done their risk assessment, they don’t do anything. It’s like, “Well, what’s the point?”


Yes, there are all sorts of unknowns. I like to say the first step is not nearly as big as you think, and success takes a lot longer than you might think. It’s that weird dichotomy. The first step literally is just to say you’re going to do it, and then start doing it. 

Microsoft deal offers free Xbox LIVE Gold sub for Office 365, with numerous caveats


It sounds great: Microsoft now offers a free year's subscription to its Xbox LIVE Gold service if you pick up an Office 365 subscription or Office 365 University.

But dig into the terms and conditions attached to the promotion, and you'll find out quickly that it doesn't apply to everybody. In fact, if you purchased either subscription within the United States, you're out of luck. (Update: Microsoft has changed the terms and conditions to include the United States.)

What this does imply, however, is that Microsoft hopes to beef up its international penetration of Office 365 by piggybacking it onto the more popular Xbox game console. The deal is available in Canada and Mexico, plus many European countries like France, Spain, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Two of the so-called BRIC countries are also included: Brazil, and Russia.
Microsoft
But you're also out of luck if you purchased any of the following, which are not eligible for the deal:
Office 365 Home Premium (monthly subscription)Office 365 Small Business PremiumOffice 2013 Suites (Home and Student, Home and Business and Professional)Office 2013 Standalone ApplicationsOffice for Mac 2011 Suites (Home and Student and Home and Business)All previous versions of Microsoft Office (2003, 2007, 2010)Office 365 trial productNot-For-Resale or promotional productOffice 365 products licensed under a volume licensing agreementYes, if you decided to pay for Office 365 on a monthly basis, you're not eligilble. And there's no love for the long-suffering Apple Macintosh platform, which has to make do with Microsoft's older products. (In the UK, Office 365 University costs £59.99 for a four-year subscription on up to two devices; otherwise, Office 365 Home Premium costs £79.99 per year, for up to four devices.)
 
Note that if you've waded through all this and find that you're actually eligible for the promotion, you can log in at office.com/xbox, enter your Microsoft ID, and then redeem your code for a year's worth of Xbox LIVE Gold. The code is transferable before you activate it, say from a subscription-holding parent to another family member.
 
Microsoft has embraced the cloud, not just as a way to sync settings, apps and data between devices and inject live information into documents, but as a stable, recurring-revenue model. One of the more eagerly anticipated pieces of data in Microsoft's earnings report, due Thursday afternoon, is how many Office 365 licenses it's sold. With this plan, that number might get a bit of a lift. 

Monday, 15 July 2013

Ballmer outlines the road ahead for Microsoft Office, Skype, 'Bing Now'

According to Microsoft's Steve Ballmer, the future of Microsoft involves such things as "living" documents, the Microsoft equivalent of "Google Now," a blurring of email and chat, and the ability to add a gaming layer to everyday activities.

It's an ambitious vision, and Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer laid it all out in a strategy document that accompanied his "One Microsoft" memo outlining an ambitious company reorganization. While most of the early attention paid to Microsoft's strategy correctly focused on what the reorganization means for the short term, it's worth focusing on what the company has in store for the longer-term future of its product groups, too.

Ballmer made much of the fact that Microsoft is reorganizing around devices and services and moving away from being a purely software-driven business. But Microsoft was founded on identifying and meeting key needs that it can address, such as productivity, collaboration, and fun. What Ballmer's document appears to do is essentially remix those concepts, combining them in much the same way painters mix primary colors together, to develop new and profitable combinations of technologies.

Ballmer addresses five key areas: the future of documents, anticipatory data, the future of social, gaming, and the "shell" of the Windows interface.

"Documents are going from being printed to being experienced," Ballmer writes. "There are many high-value needs for personal creative expression — some just for fun, others at work or at school. We will reinvent the tools and form of expressing oneself (and expressing things as a group) from paper and slides to online. We will ensure that the tools handle multimedia (photos, videos, text, charts and slides) in an integrated way and natively online."

That's exactly the conclusion we reached on Wednesday, a day before Ballmer released his reorgnization memo. By injecting data into documents via Bing and the cloud, users are encouraged both to use Microsoft Office and to let documents "live," connected to the cloud. These "living documents" can't be easily reproduced by reader technology from Google and others, making Office that much more valuable.

"Our machine learning infrastructure will understand people’s needs and what is available in the world, and will provide information and assistance," Ballmer writes. "We will be great at anticipating needs in people’s daily routines and providing insight and assistance when they need it. When it comes to life’s most important tasks and events, we will pay extra attention. The research done, the data collected and analyzed, the meetings and discussions had, and the money spent are all amplified for people during life’s big moments. We will provide the tools people need to capture their own data and organize and analyze it in conjunction with the massive amount of data available over the Web."

If this doesn't sound eerily similar to what Google already does with Google Now, then you haven't been paying attention. Google Now works by sniffing your email, calendar, and location, among other things, and reminds you of what time your flight leaves and how long it will take to get there. Frankly, Google Now is one of those "Wow!" technologies that adds real value to Android -- and Google is busy adding them to Chrome, too. Microsoft offers very little that's comparable, and it seems intent upon changing that.

Using Bing as an "intelligence engine," Microsoft could begin collating information from Mail/Outlook/Outlook.com, the calendaring applications of both, location from Windows Phone, and traffic. Google's foundation is its massive wealth of data, and its ability to understand how that data interrelates to each other and to its users. But Microsoft needs to offer at least an outwardly competitive solution. It appears that the company intends to do so.

"Social communications are time-intensive, high-value scenarios that are ripe for digital re-imagination," Ballmer writes. "Such innovation will include new ways to participate in work meetings, PTA and nonprofit activities, family and social gatherings, and more. We can reimagine email and other communication vehicles as the lines between these vehicles grow fuzzy, and the amount of people’s digital or digitally assisted interaction continues to grow. We can create new ways to interact through hardware, software and new services. Next-gen documents and expression are an important part of online social communications. We will not focus on becoming another social network for people to participate in casually, though some may use these products and services that way."

In the beginning, there was email, and Outlook. Over the years, Microsoft has added calendaring (including the ability to share calendars); SharePoint; its enterprise videoconferencing and instant messaging client, Lync; Yammer; and Skype. All of these are different approaches to the same problem: how to easily communicate, collaborate, and share content both between consumers and business colleagues.


What Ballmer appears to be saying is that we should expect these products to coalesce into one another, although what the final form will be isn't clear. Microsoft already began integrating Lync and Skype in June, has previewed Skype for Outlook.com, and announced plans to integrate Yammer and SharePoint functionality, as well as Yammer and email. A planned Lync Room System will provide a simplified videoconferencing system, Microsoft executives have said, while Skype will be part of the Xbox One game console.

For now all of these products should remain separate applications, but look for these to blend together over time. Within the enterprise, the focus appears to be on "collaboration"; within the consumer space, Ballmer implies that "connection" appears to be the emphasis. But both include elements of the other.

"The experience we will deliver across all our devices centers on the idea of better connecting people with the things they care about most," Ballmer writes. "This includes their files, documents, photos, videos, notes, websites, snippets, digital history, schedules, tasks, and mail and other messages, combined with real-time information from our devices and services. It is more than what we think of as the shell today, and no current label really fits where we are headed. Neither the desktop nor the social graph describes this new experience, and neither does the search box, the pin board or the file system."

Ballmer's statement that "we will not focus upon another social network for people to participate in casually" also implies that its social network, So.cl, will remain a technology play, rather than a distinct product.


Microsoft raised eyebrows when its first introduction of the Xbox One console focused less on its capabilities as a game console and more as a TV set-top box. But Microsoft's announcement that it would combine live streams of NFL football games with fantasy-football updates in real time is an example of Microsoft's plans for gaming, which include using the Xbox One to provide what it calls "interactive participation".

"Although we will enable these activities effectively, our biggest opportunity is in creating the fun people feel most intensely, such as playing a game that lasts hours and takes real concentration, or immersing them in live events and entertainment (including sports, concerts, education and fitness) while allowing interactive participation," Ballmer writes. "Interactivity takes engagement and makes things serious; it really requires differentiated hardware, apps and services. People want to participate at home and on the go, and in gatherings with others."

Ballmer also writes that Microsoft also sees "opportunity in fitness and health," which probably implies, at the least, a pedometer app for Windows Phone as well as more opportunities for Microsoft's Kinect peripheral. One of the opportunities for Kinect for Windows, Microsoft executives have said, is assisting physical therapy by guiding patients through the proper movements.


Finally, there's Windows 8, which Ballmer has called the "most remarkable replatforming from Windows," based not in small part on its revolutionary UI. And that, apparently, will not go away.

"We will continue to reinvent the core 'shell' of our family of devices and build upon what we have started with Windows 8," Ballmer writes. "We will keep evolving our new modern look, expanding the shell so that it allows people and their devices to capture, store and organize their 'stuff' in new ways. Our UI will be deeply personalized, based on the advanced, almost magical, intelligence in our cloud that learns more and more over time about people and the world. Our shell will natively support all of our essential services, and will be great at responding seamlessly to what people ask for, and even anticipating what they need before they ask for it."

We've already seen some examples of this: The Live Tiles in the People app within Windows Phone and Windows 8, for example, already display the images of a user's contacts. Meanwhile, Microsoft "evolved" the Start page in Windows 8.1, sharing background images with the desktop and reworking the Apps screen.

What's clear is that Ballmer has a goal in mind for Microsoft, and this week's reorganization was simply the latest milestone on its journey. It's a rare thing for a company to outline its plans for the future, even conceptually. Time will tell, however, if it's headed in the right direction.

Saturday, 13 July 2013

Box Office Report: Early Friday Returns Show 'Pacific Rim,' 'Grown Ups 2' in Tight Race


There's a fierce race going on at the North American box office as Guillermo del Toro's Pacific Rim and Adam Sandler comedy Grown Ups 2 jockey for position.

Universal's Despicable Me 2, however, could beat both and stay at No. 1 in its second weekend with a gross as high as $48 million.

PHOTOS: 'Pacific Rim' Premiere: Big Robots Bring Out the Big Stars

Defying soft prerelease tracking, Pacific Rim is certainly doing better than expected, but the film could see a precipitous drop-off on Saturday once fanboy traffic slows. It took in $3.6 million in Thursday night shows, with 23 percent coming from fanboy-friendly Imax theaters.

Some believe the 3D sci-fi epic, from Legendary Pictures and Warner Bros., could gross in the mid-$40 million range for the weekend, though most box-office experts believe it will top out at between $35 million and $40 million, a so-so number considering the tentpole's $190 million-plus budget.

Sony's Grown Ups 2 is tipped to debut in the $40 million range and earned a surprisingly strong $2.3 in Thursday night runs. The sequel, costing $80 million to produce, opens three years after the original film turned into a box-office hit, bowing to $40.5 million and ultimately grossing $271.4 million worldwide.

The ensemble comedy, receiving blistering reviews, reteams Sandler with Kevin James, Chris Rock, David Spade, Salma Hayek, Maya Rudolph and Maria Bello.

Prerelease tracking for Pacific Rim was notably soft, but Warners and Legendary say stellar reviews and word of mouth are fueling a better-than-expected performance. Legendary took the lead on the movie, including paying for most of the budget.

STORY: 'Pacific Rim' Director Guillermo del Toro: 'Post-Conversion 3D Can Be Great'

Pacific Rim, pitting giant robots against alien monsters, stars Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi and Charlie Day.

Overseas, Pacific Rim is off to a strong start in Asia, Russia and Argentina, though it fared dismally in Australia on Thursday, coming in No. 4 behind the the opening day of The Heat, Despicable Me 2 and Monsters University (the two animated films are benefiting from school holidays).

Pacific Rim grossed $7.8 million from 25 markets on Thursday, led by Russia with $2 million. It also prospered across Asia, taking in $1.5 million in South Korea, marking Warners' third-largest opening day of all time in that market.

VIDEO: 'Pacific Rim's' Charlie Hunnam Says Filming Was Like Running on Worst Elliptical Ever

So far internationally, the epic is outpacing a slew of films that went on to gross between $300 million and $400 million overseas, including Rise of the Planet of the Apes, Clash of the Titans and Prometheus. It's also pacing on par with World War Z, which has earned more than $200 million to date at the foreign box office.

Pacific Rim opens just as Thomas Tull's Legendary and Warners prepare to part ways. This week, Legendary announced it had struck a new co-financing and production deal with Universal.

Despicable 2 has already earned well north of $316 million worldwide.

Box Office Report: 'Pacific Rim' Opens to $3.6 Million Thursday Night; 'Grown Ups 2' Nabs $2.3 Million



Fanboys turned out in strong numbers Thursday night to see Guillermo del Toro's Pacific Rim, taking in $3.6 million to match the start of World War Z, which went on to gross $66.4 million for the weekend.

From Warner Bros. and Legendary Pictures, Pacific Rim made headlines as it opened in Asia on Thursday, grossing $3.8 million from seven markets. The 3D sci-fic epic outpaced a slew of films that went on to gross between $300 million and $400 million internationally.

The news from Australia, which often mirrors the U.S. in terms of playability, was more troubling. Pacific Rim grossed a soft $666,000 as it opened on Thursday, coming in No. 4 behind Despicable Me 2, the opening day of The Heat and Monsters University (with school holidays, Despicable 2 and Monsters U are thriving).

Sony's ensemble Adam Sandler comedy Grown Ups 2 didn't do too shabby either as it likewise began rolling out in North America Thursday night, grossing an impressive $2.3 million. That's a great result for a comedy and easily bested the $1 million earned Thursday night by box-office pleaser The Heat.

PHOTOS: 'Pacific Rim' Premiere: Big Robots Bring Out the Big Stars

Box-office experts are divided as to whether Pacific Rim can overcome poor tracking. Based on prerelease tracking, they believe it may only open in the $30 million range, a financially precarious beginning for a movie that cost at least $190 million to produce (Legendary took the lead on the project and paid for the majority of the budget).

But WB and Legendary believe Pacific Rim could gross well north of $40 million, based on strong reviews and the buzz on social media. The big question will be how much Pacific Rim drops. A fanboy-driven film often will do especially big business on Friday but see substantial declines as the weekend progresses. That won't be the case if Pacific Rim can lure families as well.

Pacific Rim, pitting giant robots against alien monsters, stars Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi and Charlie Day.

Imax theaters should do big business, with 23 percent of Thursday night's gross coming from Imax locations ($835,000). Overall, 52 percent of the $3.6 million came from 3D locations, including Imax.

Pacific Rim opens just as Thomas Tull's Legendary and Warners prepare to part ways. Earlier this week, Legendary announced it has struck a new co-financing and production deal with Universal.

Sony's Grown Ups 2, with a budget of $80 million, opens three years after the original film turned into a box-office hit, opening to $40.5 million and ultimately grossing $271.4 million worldwide.

The ensemble comedy -- receiving blistering reviews -- reteams Sandler with Kevin James, Chris Rock, David Spade, Salma Hayek, Maya Rudolph and Maria Bello. Grown Ups 2 had an abysmal 3 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes as of Thursday afternoon.

Sony insiders believe the sequel will open in the same range as the 2010 film.

Universal's megahit Despicable Me 2 could easily stay at No. 1 in its second weekend. The 3D animated tentpole has already earned north of $165 million domestically and over $316 million worldwide.

Friday, 12 July 2013

Corner Office: So Who Says a New Business Has to Be Small?

A. I did. My parents were entrepreneurs. They ran a small ad agency in upstate New York.

Q. What were your high school years like?

A. I never did particularly well in school, but I did get really into things. I used to build robots, and dove right into computers to the point where my schoolwork suffered. Then I really became inspired by people like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. In high school, I started my first company, called M Cubed Software. We named it that because it was me and two other guys named Mike.

Q. So did you bypass college?

A. My dad died from cancer when I was 18, and my mom was in a really tough spot. So I wanted to try to help at home. I had started doing some technology consulting. Then a friend of the family got me an interview at I.B.M. They hired me basically as an intern, and they told me not to plan on being there beyond the internship. They also said they don’t hire anyone who doesn’t have a degree.

But I was determined to make sure that I became so valuable that they couldn’t let me go. And that was what happened, and they eventually hired me full time. I.B.M. was my college education, effectively. They were very good at teaching you management.

Q. And the next big step?

A. I left I.B.M. in 1989, when I was 22, to start a company called Paper Software.

Q. What did you learn from that?

A. The first lesson was that I’d bought all these business books because I hadn’t gone to school. And I really got into the theoretical aspects of starting a company. Then what I finally realized after about six months is that I just needed to do it. I just needed to actually build something. And that was a good lesson — do something, build something and everything will happen from there.

I was able to recruit three really awesome I.B.M. engineers. I had to pay them a lot of money to join. One day, two of them said, “Hey, can you come outside and go for a walk with us?” They told me they were going to quit and start a company that was basically going to do what we were doing. I had two other guys working for me who were up-and-coming engineers, and I was paying them a fraction of what I was paying these guys. I came back to the office and I pulled my small team together and said: “O.K., I have good news and bad news. The bad news is, we just lost half of our engineers, but the good news is we kept the best half.”

And that was a great moment, when I learned how you rally people around hardship, and give them the opportunity to step up. You can actually get better output from people when you give them more than what they normally would be expected to handle.

Q. You eventually sold Paper Software to Netscape and moved to the West Coast to join Netscape. Lessons from that experience?

A. One of the biggest mistakes I made at Netscape was to focus too much on competition. Microsoft was trying to kill us. And that caused us to think about what we were going to do about Microsoft. What we really should have been thinking was: How do we focus on what our users want? Why did they love our product? How do we make it more of something that they love? So my advice is, every time you have a thought about the competition, replace that with a thought about your customer and you’ll do far better as a business.

Q. Other lessons for would-be entrepreneurs that you’ve learned over the years?

A. I think a lot of entrepreneurs go into building a start-up thinking they should focus on a niche, and do the simplest thing that can be done. But there is a problem with that approach. In fact, it may be even harder to build that kind of niche company than it is to build a giant company that might someday be able to change the world. It’s going to take the same amount of life force. You’re going to get up in the morning, work 12 to 15 hours every day. You’ll make huge, hard decisions, hire and fire people and build teams. It literally takes the same amount of energy.

So what I think is counterintuitive is that if you focus on the big idea, the biggest thing you can possibly do, that’s actually somewhat easier, because you can attract more investment that way. You can attract more talent that way. It’s more fun, and you have way more room to maneuver.

Q. How do you hire? What qualities are you looking for? What questions do you ask?

A. I ask people what’s driving them, and what’s motivating them. I’m looking for answers along the lines of: “I want to be a part of a great team. I want to learn from really great people. I love the people I’ve met here, and I’d love to just be part of this.” I also look for people who are into doing something really meaningful and great. So I’m looking to see if their answers are centered around those two pillars. I’m trying to build a culture that’s focused primarily on the camaraderie of the team, because we’re going on a really big, important and giant journey together.

I don’t hire anyone who doesn’t genuinely share that motivation, no matter how good they are on paper. Because you have to have a durable team so that when you do hit hard patches, people are just as motivated to continue to drive forward. The team sticks together. That’s what is really required in building a company. You’re going to hit those hard spots, and you’re actually defined by how you come out of those at the end.

Q. What other questions do you ask?

A. I’ll ask them about the hardest situation they’ve ever been in, and how they navigated through it. I’ll ask: What’s your greatest triumph? What’s the thing that you’re most proud of that you’ve done in your career? And then: What are some of the core lessons you’ve learned? You can have a 90-minute conversation just with those questions.

Young, Rich and Relocating Yet Again in Hunt for Political Office

Two years ago, Sean Eldridge and his husband, the Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes, bought a $5 million estate in Garrison, about 50 miles north of New York City. It offered 80 acres of rolling fields and a farmhouse once owned by a Vanderbilt. It would also allow Mr. Eldridge, 26, to run for the local Congressional seat if he chose to.

But that seat appeared unattainable, and soon the couple’s gaze shifted north, to the neighboring district on the other side of the Hudson River. In January, they bought a $2 million modern home here overlooking a reservoir, laying the groundwork for Mr. Eldridge’s campaign for their new local Congressional seat, New York’s 19th.

Word of Mr. Eldridge’s political plans has delighted the friends who make up his social circle: Donors to his exploratory committee include George Soros, the billionaire financier, and Sean Parker, the tech entrepreneur behind Napster and Spotify.

But his ambitions have puzzled some residents among the farmers, mill workers and small-business owners who populate this district, which rises through the Catskills and rolls north through cornfields and apple orchards to the Vermont border.

Amy Shields, a mother of three children who lives a few miles from Mr. Eldridge, cannot get over the fact that he has just moved into town and is already planning a run for Congress.

“It’s a little bit presumptuous,” Ms. Shields said. “In a community like this you like to know who your neighbors are. Having ties to your neighbors is important. How can he expect to represent people he doesn’t know?”

Mr. Eldridge and Mr. Hughes are among the most politically active of a new generation of entrepreneurs who gained their fortunes in Silicon Valley. Mr. Hughes, who left Facebook with about $500 million, oversaw online organizing for President Obama’s 2008 campaign and has since bought The New Republic. The two men helped raise tens of thousands of dollars for Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and his push for same-sex marriage.

But Congressional campaigns, especially in upstate New York, can be very personal contests, built on longstanding relationships and local perceptions. And it may be hard to dislodge the incumbent, Representative Chris Gibson, a well-liked Republican and veteran of the Iraq war who lives in a modest home around the corner from where he grew up.

In an interview, Mr. Gibson, 49, politely deflected questions about Mr. Eldridge. But he hinted at the kind of campaign he might run, noting that his constituents included lifelong friends and relatives. “There are some things money can’t buy,” he said.

Mr. Eldridge’s arrival is being taken seriously by Republicans in Washington, who worry that his sizable checkbook makes him a threat, given the time he has to lay the foundation for his candidacy before the election next year.

Mr. Eldridge is not a newcomer to tough campaigns — though he has never been a candidate. In 2011, he left law school to join Freedom to Marry, a group that pushed lawmakers in the New York Legislature to legalize same-sex marriage.

In an interview, he dismissed any suggestion that his move to the 19th District was motivated by politics. “The Hudson Valley is my home,” he said. “It’s where I work. It’s where I got married.”

Mr. Eldridge said he and his husband, who also own a loft in SoHo in Manhattan, were settling into their new upstate home. He described a routine that includes grocery shopping and dining in Woodstock, the artsy enclave nearby. “We’re very involved in the community,” he said.

Mr. Eldridge’s supporters note that for all the trappings of wealth he now possesses, Mr. Eldridge grew up in a middle-class community in Ohio, where both of his parents were doctors; they say he has a genuine understanding of people of modest means.

And while the 19th District has vast stretches of rural, conservative communities, it is also home to more Democratic-leaning places, like New Paltz and Monticello, that could give his candidacy a lift.

“He clearly has a bright future,” said Mike Hein, a Democrat who is the Ulster County executive.

Thursday, 11 July 2013

How Microsoft is using live data to redefine the Office 'document'

Microsoft is planning an overhaul of our Office documents, weaving live data into the once-static fabric of our Word files and Excel spreadsheets. It’s a bold experiment that could kill the very definition of an Office “document”—but it could also spell the rebirth of Microsoft’s productivity suite in the age of cloud-driven collaboration.

At its Build 2013 conference in June, Microsoft evangelized tools that will enable app developers to automatically use Bing’s search capabilities in documents—for example, they might enhance a travel guide with live demographic information on Belize. And Microsoft’s new PowerBI tools, announced Monday at the company’s Worldwide Partner Conference, can import data from both public and private sources to provide more up-to-date context in documents.

Both developments reveal a sea change in the way we’ll interact with Microsoft Office in the future. In the current regime, you create an Office document, save it, and then email it to a colleague, who quite likely prints it out. Indeed, the documents we create today represent just a slice of information within a brief snapshot of time.

But all this can change once Office begins hooking into living data. Office docs won’t simply document the past: They’ll also accurately reflect the ever-changing present.
MicrosoftKelly Waldher, Microsoft
”In the past, people would send around a static spreadsheet or a static PDF, with static data,” Kelly Waldher, director of Office 365 product management for Microsoft, said in an interview. “What PowerBI offers with Office 365 are a couple of new elements: real-time updates and real-time data.”

Microsoft has connected its SQL Azure cloud database to SharePoint Online, creating shared PowerBI workspaces that partners and coworkers can access, Waldher said. With a live data source powering the document, you can be sure you’re getting the most up-to-date information—and therefore the best information to base decisions on. This model assumes that documents will no longer be printed out or archived in a dead, static format, since doing so would rob them of the contextual intelligence that live data offers.

Microsoft understands that its vision will first be enabled within business environments, where enterprise tools can make sense of big data. But it’s not hard to imagine a future where a college paper on climate change might feature an interactive map that plots average mean temperatures for various cities. With consumers increasingly turning to the cloud for data storage, people will place less value on older, static documents, and more on up-to-date responses to changing conditions. That preference could extend way beyond Microsoft, and into the greater information ecosystem as a whole.
Microsoft sees its Bing search technology as the foundation for a number of capabilities.
At Microsoft’s Build 2013 conference, Gurdeep Singh Pall, corporate vice president for Microsoft’s Information Platform & Experience group, announced “Bing as a platform,” taking what we know as Microsoft’s search engine, and making it available to developers as a third-party API. “The unbounded knowledge of the Web is now available to your applications,” Pall said.

One of the tricks Microsoft executives showed was the capability to scan a block of text for keywords—such as “Valencia, Spain”—and hotlink the text to Bing-curated data. It exemplified how we might take an otherwise static document and enrich it with the Web at large.

This past March, Microsoft launched a preview of its Data Explorer tool, which allowed users to pull data from various sources and put it into Excel documents. For example, you could tell Excel to pull a compilation of credit card complaints from data.gov, or to pull a list of World Cup winners from a Wikipedia article. By itself, that capability wasn’t terribly exciting.
MicrosoftThe number of songs we listen to and purchase has declined, data reveals.
But on Monday, Microsoft renamed Data Explorer as “Power Query,” and surrounded it with a number of equally robust tools: Power Map for geolocating data; Power Pivot for flexible data models within Excel; and Power View, which allows Excel to parse data itself and to attempt to present the most relevant views automatically. Microsoft has also developed a number of BI “live sites” where customers can interact and share data.

Microsoft corporate fellow Amir Netz did a wonderful job of putting it all in context. (Netz’s presentation is archived here; fast-forward to 4:03:05 for the BI demo.) In a demonstration that used a database of popular music as an example, Netz typed in “top rock classics” as a query. The responses were automatically sorted into a track list from the 1970s and 1980s, cross-indexed by the number of weeks each song appeared on the chart. Highlighting certain words auto-suggested other choices. Highlighting “songs,” for example, suggested a list of “albums” with the same characteristics, providing avenues for further exploration.

“When I typed ‘top rock classics,’ it understood I meant rock,” Netz said. “And when I said ‘classics,’ it understood that I meant music from a certain era—the ’70s and the ’80s—and not the 1950s.”

Asking for the number of songs by year automatically generated a line graph tracking how the number of popular songs people listened to decreased between 1970 and 2000. Netz finished up by asking PowerBI to determine the best song of all time (Jason Mraz’s “I’m Yours”) and the best artist of all time (Mariah Carey). This assessment was based on what the database “knew” about each artist. Netz finished with a “king of the hill” visualization that tracked which artist dominated during which year.

”It is the beginning of a conversation with PowerBI,” Netz said, as he input a query into the search box.
MicrosoftMadonna ruled 1987 in this “king of the hill” visualization.
If Microsoft’s vision takes hold, static documents loaded with static data will seem increasingly irrelevant as time goes by. Imagine a PDF from your travel agency that answers the basic question, “What are the best countries for me to visit in Europe and the Middle East for a summer vacation?” In today’s version of the document, the answers are fixed. But we should be able to ask that query at any time, and receive answers that reflect a multitude of variables—exchange rates, hotel availability, weather, and political stability.
MicrosoftAre natural-language queries the future of data interaction?

We already live in a world where the living Web and other information sources dynamically respond to changing conditions. Take, for example, the Max tool from Netflix, which asks you questions to determine which movie you want to view. The Netflix database constantly updates itself with new movie titles, and uses information gleaned from everyone’s user searches to make other recommendations.

So at what point will traditional Office “documents”—spreadsheets, Word documents, and the like—begin to go away, victims of their own irrelevance? We don’t need to store Word documents that list the 20 bands that have the most number one hits, because that information is already stored in a database somewhere. But we will store our own analyses that machines can’t provide: the fable of Beowulf and Grendel analyzed in a historical context, for example.

If Microsoft’s vision of live, connected files becomes reality, the document of tomorrow could evolve into a framework, a predefined query. We may not know what the 100 highest-grossing movies of 2010 through 2020 will be, but we can create a document that’s preformatted to access that information—and to do so in a way that will let us quickly determine whether a sequel is primed for box-office success.

If that happens, seemingly disparate technologies—Office, Bing, and Azure—will become more closely tied to one another. And what we mean by “documents” will move far beyond today’s traditional definition.

As a result, live data sources will serve as increasingly tangible barriers that prevent data from migrating off of Office to other platforms. Indeed, while Google Apps and Apple’s iWork might let you open Microsoft’s PowerPoint format, you may not find the same level of support for Microsoft’s highly involved living-data technologies. For business users, at least, it may pay to remain under Microsoft’s umbrella.

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Secrets of the paperless office: optimizing OCR

Since I started using a document scanner about seven years ago, I’ve scanned many thousands of pages and used OCR (optical character recognition) software to convert those scans into searchable PDFs. I’ve also written extensively about the paperless office. But when you try to reduce the amount of paper you use, you inevitably increase the amount of hard-drive space you use. I began to wonder what combinations of scanner settings and software would get the best quality scan results while using the least hard-disk space.

What sparked my investigation was a claim that some OCR apps increase the file sizes of scanned images dramatically, whereas others (Acrobat Pro in particular) shrink them. When you plan to store and read scanned documents on an iOS device, compactness is especially important. Unfortunately, Adobe’s $499 Acrobat Pro XI can no longer be driven externally by AppleScript, which means it requires tedious manual clicking to perform OCR. Were other OCR apps really inflating file sizes, and was there any way around this problem without resorting to Acrobat?

Hundreds of experiments later, I came up with some surprising results. Read on for all the details or skip to the “So, where’s the sweet spot?” section for the bottom line.

When you initially save a scanned document as a PDF file, you get nothing more than a bitmapped image in a PDF wrapper. Your scanner’s software most likely has settings to determine the resolution of the scans in dpi (dots per inch), the color mode (black and white, grayscale, or color), and the amount of compression applied to the scanned image. All those settings affect not only the appearance of the scan but also the quality of information the OCR engine has to work with. Once OCR software recognizes the text in a PDF, it saves that text in an invisible layer along with the image so you can see what the document originally looked like, but can also search, select, and copy its text.


Besides recognizing the text, OCR software may downsample the image (decrease its resolution, so that it takes up less space) or change the compression used. Sometimes these features are user-configurable; in other cases, they’re hardwired. Acrobat Pro has yet another option—a feature called ClearScan that replaces all the bitmapped text with a custom font (which takes up much less space), and then swaps out the original image for one with a much lower resolution. ClearScan nearly always results in the smallest possible PDF, but it may not be the best choice if you want to be sure your scanned image looks exactly like the original, even when printed. In addition, using ClearScan means settling for Acrobat’s OCR engine, about which I’ll say more in a moment.

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

The Mac office: Embracing the nearly paperless future

I have a nice document scanner. I have great OCR and document-management software. I have a solid system for converting paper into digital documents. I hardly ever print anything. I even wrote a book on the paperless office. And yet, somehow, I still have tons of papers in my home office, and despite my best efforts, more appear all the time. What’s happening?
The old joke goes, “The paperless office has about as much of a chance as the paperless bathroom.” For the moment, let’s ignore the fact that paperless bathrooms are apparently becoming a thing. Is the paperless office really that hopeless?

The business world is in fact making slow but steady progress toward paper reduction. For example, the use of office paper decreased by 40 percent from 2000 to 2011, and it’s increasingly rare to find banks, utilities, and other services that don’t offer paperless billing and payments. Those of us who run small companies may be in an ideal position to push things further, because unlike managers in big corporations, we have greater latitude to set our own rules—and less inertia to overcome.

How to print photos from Aperture the easy way

Printing photos doesn’t have to be hard. With Aperture in particular, you can print excellent images with minimal effort. That’s not to say that you can’t tweak settings further to achieve the utmost quality. But for the bulk of my output, I use this easy-to-follow system and throughly enjoy what I’ve seen emerge from my Epson Stylus R2000 photo printer.

The following steps will work with current Epson photo printers and can be easily adapted to Canon models, too. The workflow is based on the improvements that these manufacturers have made to their printer software. So if you haven’t fired up your inkjet printer lately because printing with it has been too frustrating, consider giving it another shot.

When it’s time to print, you want quick access to your best stuff. That’s one of the reasons I’m a big fan of using star ratings. Peruse your highly rated images and choose one that you would consider hanging on the wall.

Choosing the image: Photos look great on my computer. But I’d like to know how this image might look on my wall. If you’re printing 13 by 19 inches as I am for this article, then I recommend that you work with a 16-megapixel image or larger. If you have 4900 pixels on the longest side of your picture, then you should be in good shape. Pictures of more than 5000 pixels on the longest side are welcome if you have them.

Before a printing session, I always check the Display Profile for my MacBook Pro’s 15-inch Retina display (launch System Preferences and choose Displays > Color). I have a few special profiles I’ve created for other purposes, but for printing I use the default Color LCD. If you’re having a problem with accurate on-screen color, you may want to try a calibration unit for your computer. Just make sure it’s compatible the type of screen you have. For my Retina display Mac, the Color LCD profile works just fine.

Display profile: I’ve had very good luck using the default Color LCD profile for my MacBook Pro’s 15-inch Retina display. Next, I go back to Aperture and enable onscreen proofing (View > Onscreen Proofing) and choose the appropriate Proofing Profile for the inkjet paper I’m using. Finally, I set the brightness for my display about two notches below full brightness. Why do I do that? Well, the MacBook Pro display is backlit and very luminescent. The print I’m about to make will be viewed with reflective light, which is much different. Dropping my screen brightness a notch or two helps me bridge the gap between backlit and reflective art.

On-screen proofing: Turning on Onscreen Proofing helps align the image I see on my Mac with the picture that comes out of the printer. Now it’s time to print!

Choose Print Image from the File menu and click the More Options button in the lower left corner. By doing so, you’ll have the tools you need to fine-tune your output. At the top of the dialog box are a handful of presets. Choose Standard for your first image.

Basic print setup: The first group of settings in the Aperture print dialog box should be familiar to anyone who has made photo prints before. In the Printer pane below the presets, choose your printer and the paper size you wish to use. For the first image, I’ll print borderless, I’m choosing 13 x 19 Sheet Feeder Borderless. The paper size depends on the kind of output the printer supports, so not every printer will have the same options. In the next pane, Layout, set the orientation and image size. You can choose the specific paper size from the pop-up menu, or go with Maximum to Fit, as I did here.

Once you have the basics in place, jump down to the Rendering pane. Here’s one of the most important changes with modern inkjet printers: You can choose Printer Managed from the Color Profile pop-up menu. In the past I had to work with ICC profiles. But the current Epson technology has made this part of the process much easier. And since I know I have a big enough file for this output (thanks to my 16-megapixel image), I can choose Auto from the Print Resolution pop-up menu.

Now click the Print button. Aperture will prepare the job and hand it off to your printer. We’re not done quite yet. The Epson will have a few more questions, so it presents its own print dialog box. The only area I really concern myself with is thr Printer Settings pop-up menu in the middle of the dialog box.

Printer settings: The Epson has a few follow up questions for me that it presets in its own dialog box. Select the type of paper that’s loaded in the printer via the Media Type pop-up, choose color, or as in my case, AccuPhoto HG, for print mode. In the Color Mode pop-up menu, I go with Epson Vivid, but you also have the option for sRGB or Adobe RGB. Generally speaking, you will also get very good results with Adobe RGB.

I recommend choosing Best Photo from the Output Resolution pop-up and turning off High Speed for the final print (however, I often use it with the first print and can’t really tell a substantial difference in quality). The click the Print button.

More than half the time, the first image that emerges from the printer is good, and I stop right there. If I do need to make a few small adjustments, however, I can using the Image Adjustments pane. The sliders here for Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, and Sharpen affect only the print job, not the original image itself.

Fine-art borders: I can fine-tune my output using Image Adjustments. Plus, if I want, I can add fine-art borders using the Margins settings. Once I find the correct adjustments, I can save these settings by clicking the gear menu at the bottom of the dialog box and selecting Duplicate Preset. Give your new preset a descriptive name so you’ll recognize it when you return.

I’ll conclude our printing exercise with a tip. One of my favorite tricks is to set extra-wide margins, such as 1.5 inches. This will float your photo in the center of the paper, giving it a classy art gallery appearance, but without your having to cut mats.